Monday, December 12, 2011

The Obsession with "New"

In my experience, when there is a drive for toys, clothes, etc. to help families, there is often a mandate that donations be new items.  I understand that it is not as sacrificial or desirable to give someone else your worn out clothing or half-broken toys.  I also understand that people are requiring this out of a good heart because they feel like since they don't give used gifts to their own families and friends, why should other families have to get used gifts?

It's just that I think the question should be, "Why shouldn't I give already-been-loved gifts to my family and friends?"  The answer in our household is, "No reason.  Do it."

For this reason, it actually becomes a very odd experience to want to give items to people in need and to be told that I have to buy new items.  Here are some thoughts that end up going through my head:

"I rarely buy anything new... period."

"We can't always all have new things.  There is so much stuff already floating around needing a good home to use it up.  By always demanding new, we are effectively taking away at least some of ability for future generations to have the resources and ability to make their own new products."

"If I am buying something new, I feel led to research my item to buy something that was made in a way that tried to avoid harming the environment and did not exploit human workers."

"New things cost a lot.  If a family needs hand towels, why can't I buy a few adorable, gently-used towels at a thrift shop for way less money?  Then I can use the rest of the money to do more to help people out."

I love that people want to meet others' real needs, and if you have ever done so then awesome!  If done out of compassion and generosity, then your good heart is admirable.  I'm just saying: Here's for creating a culture that views used goods as valuable and equally awesome instead of "cheap" and of poor taste.  After all, I'm not too good for something someone else no longer wanted/needed... Are you?

2 comments:

Kenny said...

Yes. But I am better than you, after all ;) Anyway, someone posted on FB a while ago about a Michigan politician trying to get welfare allowances for clothing to be only usable at thrift shops. While I agree that we should all do our part to get the most out of things, as long as used items are stigmatized, it seems wrong to try to force them upon the poor.

I am, of course, not refuting your post, just trying to add another dimension to the discussion.

Karen said...

That is interesting... It does ring questionable to force stigmatized items upon the poor. If the goal is to save the rich money, of course this isn't honorable. However, this reminds me of a conversation that I think we had over the summer when we talked about what people have a RIGHT to have. Do people have a right to have new clothes? If not, should we ask taxpayers to pay for said new clothes just because some stigmatize used ones? Also, if people were required to buy used clothing, would that save enough money to help even more people who really need help? Certainly that should be a consideration.

If I had to vote on that issue, I think I'd have a hard time. I think that I can see people voting either way and genuinely trying to help people.

Of course, if we viewed used as EQUALLY AWESOME! we wouldn't have to worry about this at all. :)

Post a Comment

 

Blog Template by BloggerCandy.com